
Who Owns Your Technology Strategy?
As businesses grow, technology decisions become more complex. But who should own the strategy—and when does your current approach need
From tools that streamline your workflow to insights on where the industry’s heading, we break it down in a way that’s easy to follow—and actually useful. Whether you’re running a small business or scaling up, there’s something here to help you move forward.
The pressure to “do something with AI” is everywhere.
New tools promise faster work, lower costs, better analysis and automation. Software your business already uses is adding AI features. Employees may already be experimenting with ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini or other tools on their own.
But before asking Which AI should we buy?, there is a more important question:
What are we actually ready to do with it?
AI readiness isn’t simply having the budget or technology. It means understanding where AI could genuinely improve your business, how it will change the way people work, what information you’re willing to expose to it and whether employees will actually embrace it.
Those questions are increasingly important. Statistics Canada reports that business use of AI has tripled since 2024. Yet cybersecurity and privacy concerns are now the most commonly reported barrier limiting AI use among Canadian businesses.
So before investing in another AI tool, consider four things.
AI can summarize documents, analyze large amounts of information, generate content, identify patterns, answer questions from internal knowledge, automate portions of workflows and increasingly perform multi-step tasks.
That doesn’t mean your business needs all of it.
The more useful exercise is to examine how work moves through your organization.
Where are people losing time? Where is information difficult to find? Where is repetitive work preventing skilled employees from doing higher-value work?
Those are potential AI opportunities.
But there’s an important distinction between automating an existing process and improving it.
Canadian businesses adopting AI are discovering this themselves. Among businesses planning to use AI, 41.9% expected to develop new workflows rather than simply inserting AI into their existing ones. Among businesses already using AI in 2025, developing new workflows was the most commonly reported operational change.
That should make leaders pause.
If a process has six unnecessary steps, automating those six steps doesn’t necessarily make it a good process.
Before asking where AI fits into your workflow, ask whether the workflow itself still makes sense.
AI may enhance one step, reshape several steps or create an entirely better way of getting the work done.
AI adoption isn’t purely a technology project.
It’s a people project.
That becomes particularly important when employees hear phrases such as automation, efficiency and productivity. Leadership may mean, “We want to remove repetitive work.”
Employees may hear, “We need fewer people.”
Research published by Harvard Business Review in 2026 helps explain why some employees react negatively. As AI begins performing work previously associated with human expertise, employees can perceive threats to their competence, autonomy and connection to others at work. When those needs are supported, people are more likely to see AI as a useful copilot.
That makes the message surrounding AI important.
Instead of:
“We’re implementing AI to improve productivity.”
Leadership can be much more specific:
“Our team currently spends six hours every week manually compiling this report. We want to see whether AI can reduce that work so the team has more time to analyze the results and work with clients.”
Now employees understand the problem, the purpose and where their expertise still matters.
And don’t underestimate their willingness to participate.
McKinsey research found that executives significantly underestimated how much employees were already using generative AI. It also identified employees who were optimistic about AI but wanted to work with their organizations to develop responsible ways of using it.
The employees closest to a process may actually be the best people to identify where AI could help.
Instead of selling employees on AI, involve them in deciding where it can make their work better.
This may be one of the most overlooked parts of AI adoption.
Imagine an employee pastes a confidential customer contract into an AI tool and asks:
“Summarize this and identify our major risks.”
Useful? Potentially.
But the business should also know:
Where did that contract just go?
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) warns that generative AI services may store prompts and potentially use them for training. It recommends that businesses understand provider practices around storage, monitoring and review, restrict access to confidential information, establish staff policies and consider private environments when sensitive information is involved.
Canada’s privacy regulators similarly recommend that organizations use anonymized or de-identified information where possible and only put sensitive or confidential personal information into AI prompts when authorized.
This doesn’t mean businesses should be afraid to use AI.
It means they should understand the environment in which they’re using it.
Enterprise and private AI environments can offer very different controls than freely available consumer tools. The important thing is making those decisions intentionally.
For businesses, the practical lesson is straightforward:
Don’t let employees determine your AI and intellectual-property policy one prompt at a time.
Decide which tools are approved, what information they can access and where human review is required.
There’s a final trap.
Businesses can become very good at measuring AI usage without determining whether AI made the business better.
Number of AI users. Number of automated tasks. Hours supposedly saved.
Those numbers may be interesting, but they aren’t necessarily business outcomes.
For example, if AI drafts customer responses faster but employees spend nearly as much time correcting them, what was gained?
Recent Harvard Business Review research has also raised concerns about low-quality AI-generated material entering organizational workflows and affecting the quality of information people subsequently rely upon.
So determine the measure before implementing the tool.
Did turnaround time improve? Did employees recover meaningful time? Did customers receive faster or better service?
AI usage isn’t the objective.
Business improvement is.
Before You Invest in AI, Ask Yourself
AI Readiness Is Really Business Readiness
AI adoption will continue to accelerate. But being first to acquire the latest tool isn’t the same as being prepared to use it well.
The organizations positioned to benefit most won’t necessarily be those using AI everywhere.
They’ll be the ones that understand where it can create value, how it can improve the way work gets done, how to bring their people along and what needs to be protected along the way.
So perhaps the first AI investment shouldn’t be a tool at all.
It should be the time spent understanding what you want AI to change—and what you don’t.

As businesses grow, technology decisions become more complex. But who should own the strategy—and when does your current approach need

Learn how to build a technology roadmap that aligns software, systems, and digital investments with long-term business growth and operational

Businesses often struggle to measure software success. Learn a practical framework for tracking software ROI before and after launch, helping

Launching software is only the beginning. Learn how businesses measure software ROI through time saved, operational efficiency, reduced errors, scalability,